| |
 |
 Appeared in MIT´s Technology Review.
By Gregory T. Huang
Ask Ron Rivest if he’s ever been whisked away by the CIA in the
middle of the night, and he laughs—but he doesn’t say no. At
Peppercoin, a two-year-old MIT spinoff in Waltham, MA, the renowned
cryptographer oversees an operation far less secretive than an
intelligence agency but almost as intense: a clearinghouse for
electronic “micropayments,” pocket-change transactions that may
finally allow magazines, musicians, and a multitude of others to
profit from selling their wares online. It’s September, and with
only weeks to go until commercial launch, Peppercoin’s software
engineers troubleshoot at all hours. Marketing executives shout
across the room and over the phone, making deals.
But in the eye of the storm, Rivest is calm and collected. Eyes
sparkling, real change jingling in his pocket, he even wears sandals
with authority. What Peppercoin is trying to do, he says, is make it
easy to “pay as you go” for inexpensive Web content—so you won’t
need to pay subscription fees, limit yourself to free content, or
share files illegally. With a click of the mouse—and Peppercoin’s
software churning away behind the scenes—you can now download a
single MP3 from an independent-music site, watch a news video clip,
or buy the latest installment of a Web comic from your favorite
artist. All for just pennies.
It sounds simple, but it wasn’t possible a few months ago. Most Web
merchants still can’t support micropayments—transactions of about a
dollar or less—because the processing fees from banks and credit
card companies erase any profit. But Peppercoin, the brainchild of
Rivest and fellow MIT computer scientist Silvio Micali, is in the
vanguard of a new crop of companies—including BitPass of Palo Alto,
CA, and Paystone Technologies of Vancouver, British Columbia—that
make cash-for-bits transactions superefficient. These companies’
founders are well aware of the string of defunct e-payment companies
whose virtual currencies have gone the way of the Confederate
dollar. But they’ve got something new up their sleeves:
easier-to-use technology that allows Web sites to accept tiny
payments by effectively processing them in batches, thereby cutting
down on bank fees.
So throw out your current conceptions of Web surfing. Rather than
sifting through pop-up ads and subscription offers, imagine dropping
a quarter on an independent film, video game, specialized database,
or more powerful search engine. If programmers and Web artists could
profitably charge a few cents at a time, their businesses could
flourish. And with an easy way for users to buy a richer variety of
content, experts say, the current deadlock over digital piracy could
effectively dissolve, giving way to a multibillion-dollar business
stream that rejuvenates the wider entertainment industry the same
way video rentals did Hollywood in the 1980s. Down the road, cell
phones, personal digital assistants, and smart cards equipped with
micropayment technology could even supplement cash in the real
world.
“The key is timing and technology,” says Rivest, who thinks
Peppercoin has both right. The company’s technical credibility, at
least, is not an issue. Rivest coinvented the RSA public-key
encryption system, used by Web browsers to make credit card
purchases secure. Micali holds more than 20 patents on data security
technologies and won the 1993 Gödel Prize, the highest award in
theoretical computer science. Their system uses statistics and
encryption to overcome profit-erasing transaction fees; the approach
is unique and more efficient than its predecessors.
The timing looks good, too—not just for Peppercoin, but for other
micropayment companies as well. “One year ago, it was, ‘Will people
pay?’ Now it’s, ‘How will they pay?’” says Ian Price, CEO of British
Telecommunications’ Click and Buy division, which uses micropayments
to sell articles, games, and other Web content to customers in more
than 100 countries. And in September, Apple Computer announced that
its online music store sold more than 10 million 99-cent songs in
its first four months. Apple’s success was the “starting gun for a
track meet of companies” planning to roll out pay-per-download
services by 2004, says Rob Carney, Peppercoin’s founding vice
president of sales and marketing.
Indeed, 40 percent of today’s online companies would sell content
they’re currently giving away if they had a viable micropayment
system, says Avivah Litan, an analyst at Gartner Research who
specializes in Internet commerce. According to Forrester Research,
the market for music downloads is expected to grow from $16 million
in 2003 to $3 billion in 2008. And a Strategy Analytics report
states that mobile-gaming revenues could top $7 billion by 2008.
“The market is ready” for micropayments, says Rivest.
Even so, getting the technology to take off won’t be easy.
Micropayment companies need to make their systems fully reliable,
secure, and easy to use. Just as important, they need to increase
demand by working with Web businesses to deliver a broader range of
digital products. So on the eve of Peppercoin’s commercial launch,
the question is not whether the timing and technology are good. It’s
whether they’re good enough.
In Statistics We Trust
Understanding Peppercoin requires a little history. According to old
English common law, the smallest unit of payment that could appear
in a contract was a peppercorn. Silvio Micali’s wife, a professor of
law, suggested that as the name for his startup back in 2001, and it
stuck (becoming “Peppercoin” for the sake of clarity). Now, in his
office at MIT’s Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence
Laboratory, Micali is explaining what makes Peppercoin tick. On hand
are technical books and papers in neat piles, should we need them.
It’s simple mathematics, says Micali—but don’t believe him.
Micali knows two things: cryptography and coffee. His micropayment
analogies involve cappuccinos. There are two standard ways of buying
digital content, he says. One is like prepaying for a certain number
of cappuccinos, the other like getting a bill at the end of the
month for all the cappuccinos you’ve had. That is, the customer
either pays up front for a bundle of content—say, 10 archived New
York Times articles—or runs a tab that’s settled every so often. The
problem with both models is that the seller has to keep track of
each customer’s tab, and the buyer is locked into a particular store
or site. But in the spring of 2001 came a “very lucky coffee break”
when Micali and Rivest, whose office is just down the hall, put
their heads together. “We started discussing this problem, and
within minutes we had the basic solution,” says Micali. “And we got
very excited! First, from the discovery. Second, from the coffee.”
What they discovered was a way to cut the overhead cost of
electronic payments by processing only a statistical sample of
transactions, like taking a poll. On average, Peppercoin might
settle, say, one out of every 100 transactions—but it pays the
seller 100 times the amount of that transaction. Given enough
transactions, it all evens out, says Micali.
It looks simple to the buyer, who only has to click on an icon to
charge an item to her Peppercoin account, but the action behind the
scenes is pretty complicated. In beta tests, special encryption
software runs on both the buyer’s and seller’s computers, protecting
their interactions from hackers and eavesdroppers. And encrypted in
each transaction is a serial number that says how many purchases the
customer has made over time, for how much, and from whom.
Ninety-nine transactions out of a hundred are not fully
processed—but they’re still logged by the seller’s computer. One
transaction out of a hundred, selected at random, is sent to
Peppercoin. After Peppercoin pays the seller 100 times the value of
that transaction, it bills the customer for all of her outstanding
purchases from all sites that use Peppercoin. Since about one out of
a hundred purchases is processed, her last bill will have come, on
average, a hundred purchases ago. That’s the trick: by paying the
seller and charging the customer in lump sums every 100 purchases or
so, Peppercoin avoids paying the fees charged by credit
cards—roughly 25 cents per transaction—on the other 99 purchases.
“This is fantastic,” says Greg Papadopoulos, chief technology
officer at Sun Microsystems and a member of Peppercoin’s technical
advisory board. “Ron and Silvio have done what needed to be done—get
the cost of transactions down without ripping up the existing
infrastructure of credit cards and banks.”
But what’s to keep all this fancy statistical footwork from cheating
sellers out of their due? And what’s to keep buyers and sellers both
from cheating the system? “That’s the secret sauce,” says Micali.
He’s talking about cryptography, the sweet science of codes and
ciphers. Its inner workings are, well, cryptic—paper titles at
conferences include things like unimodular matrix groups and
polynomial-time algorithms—but it’s used every day to keep
communications, documents, and payments secure. Roughly speaking,
says Rivest, statistical sampling of transactions makes the system
efficient, while cryptography keeps the random selection process
fair and secure. So Peppercoin charges users exactly what they owe,
and if Peppercoin’s payment to the seller happens to be more or less
than the value of the purchases customers actually made, the
discrepancy is absorbed by the seller. Over time, this jiggle will
become negligible, especially compared to the amount of money Web
sites will make that they couldn’t make before.
Think about it for too long, and most people get a headache. But
Micali and Rivest have been thinking about this sort of thing for 20
years, so they make a formidable and complementary team: Micali is
as animated as Rivest is understated, like fire and ice. “They’ve
done brilliant work over the years,” says Martin Hellman, a
professor emeritus of electrical engineering at Stanford University
and a pioneer in cryptography going back to the 1970s. “Peppercoin
has a clever approach.”
But clever mathematics aside, the proof is in the pudding. In the
end, Peppercoin’s executives say, their system must be as easy to
use as cash. Perry Solomon, Peppercoin’s founding CEO, explains it
this way, pulling some change out of his pocket. “I can give you
this quarter, and you can look at it quickly and say, ‘Okay, that’s
a quarter.’ You don’t need to call the bank to verify it.” Online
merchants, however, must check a credit card holder’s identity and
available credit before approving a purchase. Going to that trouble
makes sense for a $50 sweater or a $4,495 Segway transporter, but
not for a 50-cent song. So Peppercoin’s software stamps each
transaction with the digital equivalent of e pluribus unum—a
guarantee to the seller that it’s Peppercoin handling the
transaction, and that payment is forthcoming. The seller can quickly
verify this stamp and deliver the goods.
Next page >

December 2003.
|
|